95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
-48.38%
Both companies show declining cash positions (-48.38% vs SA's -27.43%). Seth Klarman would examine if this reflects broader market conditions or operational challenges.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-48.38%
Below half of SA's 246.84%. Michael Burry might suspect a liquidity shortfall if there's no alternative capital plan.
284.08%
Receivables growth less than half of SA's -60.79%. David Dodd might see more conservative credit practices, provided revenue isn't suffering.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
80.93%
Higher Other Current Assets Growth compared to SA's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-39.70%
Below half of SA's 231.12%. Michael Burry could suspect a liquidity squeeze. Verify operational performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-99.85%
Similar yoy growth to SA's -100.00%. Walter Schloss sees parallel approach in non-core expansions.
5.86%
Below half of SA's -8.58%. Michael Burry might suspect stagnation or lack of resources for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.32%
Below half of SA's 23.41%. Michael Burry sees a potential red flag for stagnation or capital shortage.
47.41%
Less than half of SA's 150.58%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined AP approach or lower volume.
6.45%
Higher Short-Term Debt Growth compared to SA's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.12%
Less than half of SA's 546.72%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined short-term liability approach.
5.86%
Higher Long-Term Debt Growth compared to SA's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Less than half of SA's 1.56%. David Dodd notes more conservative expansions in non-current obligations.
5.86%
Less than half of SA's -4.14%. David Dodd sees a more conservative approach to non-current liabilities.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.53%
Less than half of SA's 211.79%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-14.14%
Below half SA's 43.98%. Michael Burry suspects major net losses or high dividends vs. competitor.
100.00%
Less than half of SA's -101.82%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible or market-driven swings than competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.23%
Below half SA's 15.86%. Michael Burry sees potential underperformance in building shareholder capital.
5.32%
Below half SA's 23.41%. Michael Burry sees significant shrinkage or inactivity vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.91%
Higher Total Debt Growth compared to SA's zero value, indicating worse performance.
8.09%
Less than half of SA's 27.43%. David Dodd sees better deleveraging or stronger cash buildup than competitor.