PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
-14.46%
Cash & equivalents declining -14.46% while SA's grows 79.40%. Howard Marks would question why our liquidity is shrinking while competitor builds cash.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-14.46%
Cash + STI yoy 0.5-0.75x SA's -26.41%. Martin Whitman would worry about lagging short-term reserves. Confirm debt coverage.
-13.59%
Higher Net Receivables Growth compared to SA's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
38.11%
Higher Other Current Assets Growth compared to SA's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-12.88%
0.5-0.75x SA's -23.23%. Martin Whitman might see risk if this hampers near-term financial flexibility.
2.16%
1.25-1.5x SA's 1.69%. Bruce Berkowitz notes a significant push to expand capacity faster than competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
19.96%
Higher Long-Term Investments Growth compared to SA's zero value, indicating better performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.30%
Higher Other Non-Current Assets Growth compared to SA's zero value, indicating worse performance.
2.33%
1.25-1.5x SA's 1.68%. Bruce Berkowitz checks if expansions surpass competitor's pace but remain justified.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.98%
Below half of SA's -1.40%. Michael Burry sees a potential red flag for stagnation or capital shortage.
-13.52%
Less than half of SA's -35.45%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined AP approach or lower volume.
92.20%
Higher Short-Term Debt Growth compared to SA's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Higher Deferred Revenue (Current) Growth compared to SA's zero value, indicating better performance.
3392.34%
Less than half of SA's -30.80%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in other current obligations.
108.45%
Less than half of SA's -31.84%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined short-term liability approach.
-0.04%
Higher Long-Term Debt Growth compared to SA's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.83%
Less than half of SA's 7.39%. David Dodd sees fewer additions to deferred tax liabilities vs. competitor.
-15.94%
Less than half of SA's 6.22%. David Dodd notes more conservative expansions in non-current obligations.
-0.10%
Less than half of SA's 6.22%. David Dodd sees a more conservative approach to non-current liabilities.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.14%
Less than half of SA's -13.20%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
0.03%
Less than half of SA's -0.01%. David Dodd sees fewer share issuances vs. competitor.
3.62%
Below half SA's -3.65%. Michael Burry suspects major net losses or high dividends vs. competitor.
38.26%
Less than half of SA's -92.50%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible or market-driven swings than competitor.
100.00%
Less than half of SA's 194815068493150784.00%. David Dodd notes simpler yoy equity changes vs. competitor.
1.93%
Below half SA's -0.63%. Michael Burry sees potential underperformance in building shareholder capital.
1.98%
Below half SA's -1.40%. Michael Burry sees significant shrinkage or inactivity vs. competitor.
19.96%
Below half SA's -30.55%. Michael Burry suspects major underinvestment or forced divestment.
-0.04%
Higher Total Debt Growth compared to SA's zero value, indicating worse performance.
1.49%
Less than half of SA's -79.40%. David Dodd sees better deleveraging or stronger cash buildup than competitor.