PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
0.85%
Cash & equivalents yoy growth below half of SA's 31.87%. Michael Burry would question if the firm faces a liquidity squeeze. Check for rising debts or negative cash flow.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.85%
Below half of SA's -26.84%. Michael Burry might suspect a liquidity shortfall if there's no alternative capital plan.
-15.57%
Higher Net Receivables Growth compared to SA's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-30.70%
Higher Other Current Assets Growth compared to SA's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-0.39%
Below half of SA's -27.29%. Michael Burry could suspect a liquidity squeeze. Verify operational performance.
14.12%
≥ 1.5x SA's 4.48%. David Dodd sees more aggressive capex. Confirm it's not overspending.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
14.63%
Higher Long-Term Investments Growth compared to SA's zero value, indicating better performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.70%
Higher Other Non-Current Assets Growth compared to SA's zero value, indicating worse performance.
14.09%
≥ 1.5x SA's 4.45%. David Dodd sees significantly higher long-term asset buildup. Confirm synergy with strategy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
13.75%
≥ 1.5x SA's 1.67%. David Dodd notes a larger balance sheet expansion. Confirm it's not overleveraged.
12.50%
Less than half of SA's 27.49%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined AP approach or lower volume.
13.94%
Higher Short-Term Debt Growth compared to SA's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-13.94%
Both SA and the company show zero Deferred Revenue (Current) Growth.
-13.94%
Less than half of SA's 16.87%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in other current obligations.
12.85%
50-75% of SA's 22.66%. Bruce Berkowitz notes the firm keeps current liabilities growth relatively low.
90.51%
Higher Long-Term Debt Growth compared to SA's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.70%
50-75% of SA's 9.64%. Bruce Berkowitz notes relatively lower DTL growth.
-7.18%
Less than half of SA's -81.66%. David Dodd notes more conservative expansions in non-current obligations.
90.28%
Above 1.5x SA's 7.89%. Michael Burry sees a strong spike vs. competitor. Check coverage and debt ratios.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
88.77%
Above 1.5x SA's 11.52%. Michael Burry sees a potential leverage warning sign.
0.88%
Similar yoy changes to SA's 0.84%. Walter Schloss sees parallel capital-raising strategies.
3.85%
Below half SA's -0.32%. Michael Burry suspects major net losses or high dividends vs. competitor.
151.71%
Less than half of SA's -6.75%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible or market-driven swings than competitor.
100.00%
Less than half of SA's -100.00%. David Dodd notes simpler yoy equity changes vs. competitor.
2.56%
≥ 1.5x SA's 0.85%. David Dodd sees stronger capital base growth than competitor.
13.75%
≥ 1.5x SA's 1.67%. David Dodd sees faster overall balance sheet growth than competitor.
14.63%
Below half SA's -31.50%. Michael Burry suspects major underinvestment or forced divestment.
90.51%
Higher Total Debt Growth compared to SA's zero value, indicating worse performance.
109.70%
Less than half of SA's -31.87%. David Dodd sees better deleveraging or stronger cash buildup than competitor.