PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
28.83%
Cash & equivalents growing 28.83% while SA's declined -41.72%. Peter Lynch would see this as a sign of superior liquidity management.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
28.83%
Below half of SA's -50.61%. Michael Burry might suspect a liquidity shortfall if there's no alternative capital plan.
-84.01%
Receivables growth less than half of SA's 71.11%. David Dodd might see more conservative credit practices, provided revenue isn't suffering.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-25.84%
Higher Other Current Assets Growth compared to SA's zero value, indicating worse performance.
19.41%
Below half of SA's -47.20%. Michael Burry could suspect a liquidity squeeze. Verify operational performance.
7.60%
≥ 1.5x SA's 4.67%. David Dodd sees more aggressive capex. Confirm it's not overspending.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-35.20%
Both SA and the company show zero Long-Term Investments Growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.80%
Higher Other Non-Current Assets Growth compared to SA's zero value, indicating worse performance.
5.72%
1.25-1.5x SA's 4.66%. Bruce Berkowitz checks if expansions surpass competitor's pace but remain justified.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.95%
Below half of SA's -0.05%. Michael Burry sees a potential red flag for stagnation or capital shortage.
-33.30%
Less than half of SA's 48.92%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined AP approach or lower volume.
19.11%
Higher Short-Term Debt Growth compared to SA's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-29.30%
Above 1.5x SA's -4.36%. Michael Burry sees a red flag for liquidity risk vs. competitor.
44.33%
Higher Long-Term Debt Growth compared to SA's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-46.03%
Both SA and the company show zero Non-Current Deferred Revenue Growth.
10.42%
50-75% of SA's 17.08%. Bruce Berkowitz notes relatively lower DTL growth.
-9.55%
Similar yoy changes to SA's -11.86%. Walter Schloss sees parallel expansions in other LT liabilities.
44.14%
Above 1.5x SA's 9.08%. Michael Burry sees a strong spike vs. competitor. Check coverage and debt ratios.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
42.52%
Above 1.5x SA's 4.73%. Michael Burry sees a potential leverage warning sign.
0.17%
Above 1.5x SA's 0.05%. Michael Burry suspects heavy new equity expansion or dilution.
1.42%
Below half SA's -2.41%. Michael Burry suspects major net losses or high dividends vs. competitor.
-87.78%
Above 1.5x SA's -13.86%. Michael Burry sees a significant jump in intangible or market-based gains. Scrutinize risk of reversal.
100.00%
Less than half of SA's -299.73%. David Dodd notes simpler yoy equity changes vs. competitor.
-0.91%
≥ 1.5x SA's -0.58%. David Dodd sees stronger capital base growth than competitor.
5.95%
Below half SA's -0.05%. Michael Burry sees significant shrinkage or inactivity vs. competitor.
-35.20%
0.5-0.75x SA's -52.47%. Martin Whitman sees possible missed opportunities vs. competitor.
44.33%
Higher Total Debt Growth compared to SA's zero value, indicating worse performance.
45.99%
1.1-1.25x SA's 41.72%. Bill Ackman questions if net debt is increasing faster than competitor.