95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
15.54%
Cash & equivalents yoy growth below half of SAND's 87.30%. Michael Burry would question if the firm faces a liquidity squeeze. Check for rising debts or negative cash flow.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
15.54%
Cash + STI yoy 0.5-0.75x SAND's 26.30%. Martin Whitman would worry about lagging short-term reserves. Confirm debt coverage.
-10.50%
Receivables growth less than half of SAND's 18.98%. David Dodd might see more conservative credit practices, provided revenue isn't suffering.
2.99%
Higher Inventory Growth compared to SAND's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-100.33%
Other current assets growth < half of SAND's 72.55%. David Dodd sees a leaner approach to short-term items.
0.63%
Below half of SAND's 21.99%. Michael Burry could suspect a liquidity squeeze. Verify operational performance.
-0.37%
Below half SAND's -0.87%. Michael Burry sees potential underinvestment risk unless there's a valid reason (asset-light model).
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.37%
Higher Intangible Assets Growth compared to SAND's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-0.37%
Higher Goodwill + Intangibles Growth compared to SAND's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
79.06%
Above 1.5x SAND's 21.85%. Michael Burry warns of potential hidden liabilities or intangible bloat.
2.02%
Below half of SAND's -0.09%. Michael Burry might suspect stagnation or lack of resources for expansions.
100.00%
Higher Other Assets Growth compared to SAND's zero value, indicating worse performance.
1.10%
≥ 1.5x SAND's 0.31%. David Dodd notes a larger balance sheet expansion. Confirm it's not overleveraged.
-4.06%
Less than half of SAND's -9.80%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined AP approach or lower volume.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Higher Other Current Liabilities Growth compared to SAND's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-4.44%
Less than half of SAND's -9.80%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined short-term liability approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-4.44%
1.1-1.25x SAND's -3.67%. Bill Ackman questions if the firm is outpacing competitor in long-term leverage.
4.44%
Higher Other Liabilities Growth compared to SAND's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-4.44%
1.1-1.25x SAND's -3.96%. Bill Ackman questions if the firm is incurring more total obligations than competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.27%
0.5-0.75x SAND's 8.83%. Martin Whitman is wary of weaker retention or lower profitability.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Higher Other Stockholders' Equity Items Growth compared to SAND's zero value, indicating worse performance.
1.57%
Similar yoy to SAND's 1.45%. Walter Schloss sees parallel net worth trends.
1.10%
≥ 1.5x SAND's 0.31%. David Dodd sees faster overall balance sheet growth than competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-15.54%
Above 1.5x SAND's -8.34%. Michael Burry sees a major gap in net debt growth. Check coverage and liquidity.