95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
0.05%
Cash & equivalents yoy growth below half of SAND's 87.30%. Michael Burry would question if the firm faces a liquidity squeeze. Check for rising debts or negative cash flow.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.05%
Below half of SAND's 26.30%. Michael Burry might suspect a liquidity shortfall if there's no alternative capital plan.
8.79%
Receivables growth less than half of SAND's 18.98%. David Dodd might see more conservative credit practices, provided revenue isn't suffering.
25.00%
Higher Inventory Growth compared to SAND's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-99.98%
Other current assets growth < half of SAND's 72.55%. David Dodd sees a leaner approach to short-term items.
14.94%
0.5-0.75x SAND's 21.99%. Martin Whitman might see risk if this hampers near-term financial flexibility.
3.91%
Below half SAND's -0.87%. Michael Burry sees potential underinvestment risk unless there's a valid reason (asset-light model).
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
9.09%
Below half of SAND's -0.09%. Michael Burry might suspect stagnation or lack of resources for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
13.95%
≥ 1.5x SAND's 0.31%. David Dodd notes a larger balance sheet expansion. Confirm it's not overleveraged.
1469.52%
Less than half of SAND's -9.80%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined AP approach or lower volume.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Higher Other Current Liabilities Growth compared to SAND's zero value, indicating worse performance.
15.25%
Less than half of SAND's -9.80%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined short-term liability approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-11.33%
Above 1.5x SAND's -3.67%. Michael Burry sees a strong spike vs. competitor. Check coverage and debt ratios.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.73%
Less than half of SAND's -3.96%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.41%
0.75-0.9x SAND's 8.83%. Bill Ackman questions if competitor reinvests profits more robustly.
-6.79%
Less than half of SAND's 763.57%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible or market-driven swings than competitor.
-100.00%
Higher Other Stockholders' Equity Items Growth compared to SAND's zero value, indicating worse performance.
15.43%
≥ 1.5x SAND's 1.45%. David Dodd sees stronger capital base growth than competitor.
13.95%
≥ 1.5x SAND's 0.31%. David Dodd sees faster overall balance sheet growth than competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-11.33%
Above 1.5x SAND's -7.35%. Michael Burry sees a major jump. Investigate leverage rationale.
-5.80%
50-75% of SAND's -8.34%. Bruce Berkowitz notes comparatively lower net debt expansion.