95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
-3.16%
Cash & equivalents declining -3.16% while SAND's grows 87.30%. Howard Marks would question why our liquidity is shrinking while competitor builds cash.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.16%
Below half of SAND's 26.30%. Michael Burry might suspect a liquidity shortfall if there's no alternative capital plan.
-22.74%
Receivables growth less than half of SAND's 18.98%. David Dodd might see more conservative credit practices, provided revenue isn't suffering.
-100.00%
Higher Inventory Growth compared to SAND's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-15.29%
Other current assets growth < half of SAND's 72.55%. David Dodd sees a leaner approach to short-term items.
-4.14%
Below half of SAND's 21.99%. Michael Burry could suspect a liquidity squeeze. Verify operational performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.78%
Less than half of SAND's 21.85%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in non-core assets. Possibly a simpler focus.
4.78%
Below half of SAND's -0.09%. Michael Burry might suspect stagnation or lack of resources for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.88%
≥ 1.5x SAND's 0.31%. David Dodd notes a larger balance sheet expansion. Confirm it's not overleveraged.
-25.28%
Above 1.5x SAND's -9.80%. Michael Burry questions if payables are being stretched to avoid short-term borrowing.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.72%
Less than half of SAND's -9.80%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined short-term liability approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.65%
Less than half of SAND's -3.67%. David Dodd sees a more conservative approach to non-current liabilities.
0.65%
Higher Other Liabilities Growth compared to SAND's zero value, indicating worse performance.
0.72%
Less than half of SAND's -3.96%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
26.97%
≥ 1.5x SAND's 8.83%. David Dodd sees higher yoy retained profits than competitor.
0.29%
Less than half of SAND's 763.57%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible or market-driven swings than competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.99%
≥ 1.5x SAND's 1.45%. David Dodd sees stronger capital base growth than competitor.
3.88%
≥ 1.5x SAND's 0.31%. David Dodd sees faster overall balance sheet growth than competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.66%
Less than half of SAND's -8.34%. David Dodd sees better deleveraging or stronger cash buildup than competitor.