95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
-34.72%
Cash & equivalents declining -34.72% while SAND's grows 470.06%. Howard Marks would question why our liquidity is shrinking while competitor builds cash.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-34.72%
Below half of SAND's 470.06%. Michael Burry might suspect a liquidity shortfall if there's no alternative capital plan.
43.63%
Receivables growth less than half of SAND's 158.39%. David Dodd might see more conservative credit practices, provided revenue isn't suffering.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
261.06%
Higher Other Current Assets Growth compared to SAND's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-17.49%
Below half of SAND's 466.28%. Michael Burry could suspect a liquidity squeeze. Verify operational performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.06%
Higher Other Non-Current Assets Growth compared to SAND's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-0.06%
Both SAND and the company show zero Total Non-Current Assets Growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.23%
Below half of SAND's 508.91%. Michael Burry sees a potential red flag for stagnation or capital shortage.
46.52%
Less than half of SAND's 1722.88%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined AP approach or lower volume.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.51%
Less than half of SAND's 1722.88%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined short-term liability approach.
-8.57%
Higher Long-Term Debt Growth compared to SAND's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-8.57%
Less than half of SAND's 1722.88%. David Dodd sees a more conservative approach to non-current liabilities.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-8.16%
Less than half of SAND's 1722.88%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
13.38%
Below half SAND's -56.35%. Michael Burry suspects major net losses or high dividends vs. competitor.
-1.05%
Higher AOCI Growth compared to SAND's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-100.00%
Less than half of SAND's 408.03%. David Dodd notes simpler yoy equity changes vs. competitor.
4.09%
Below half SAND's 493.40%. Michael Burry sees potential underperformance in building shareholder capital.
-0.23%
Below half SAND's 508.91%. Michael Burry sees significant shrinkage or inactivity vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-7.99%
Higher Total Debt Growth compared to SAND's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-7.34%
Less than half of SAND's -470.06%. David Dodd sees better deleveraging or stronger cash buildup than competitor.