PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
276.15%
Cash & equivalents growing 276.15% while SAND's declined -14.06%. Peter Lynch would see this as a sign of superior liquidity management.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
276.15%
Below half of SAND's -14.06%. Michael Burry might suspect a liquidity shortfall if there's no alternative capital plan.
29.40%
Receivables growth above 1.5x SAND's 4.65%. Michael Burry would check for potential credit bubble or inflated top-line.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
26.72%
Other current assets growth < half of SAND's -70.00%. David Dodd sees a leaner approach to short-term items.
230.85%
Below half of SAND's -11.30%. Michael Burry could suspect a liquidity squeeze. Verify operational performance.
-0.37%
Below half SAND's -98.00%. Michael Burry sees potential underinvestment risk unless there's a valid reason (asset-light model).
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
26.22%
Higher Long-Term Investments Growth compared to SAND's zero value, indicating better performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-6.09%
Higher Other Non-Current Assets Growth compared to SAND's zero value, indicating worse performance.
0.08%
Below half of SAND's 178.97%. Michael Burry might suspect stagnation or lack of resources for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.66%
Below half of SAND's 8.58%. Michael Burry sees a potential red flag for stagnation or capital shortage.
-38.32%
Higher Accounts Payable Growth compared to SAND's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-4.93%
Less than half of SAND's 574.07%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined short-term liability approach.
-63.18%
Higher Long-Term Debt Growth compared to SAND's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-63.18%
Higher Total Non-Current Liabilities Growth compared to SAND's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-58.10%
Less than half of SAND's 574.07%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
-100.00%
Higher Common Stock (Book Value) Growth compared to SAND's zero value, indicating worse performance.
6.69%
Below half SAND's -34.57%. Michael Burry suspects major net losses or high dividends vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
27.41%
Below half SAND's -19.06%. Michael Burry sees potential underperformance in building shareholder capital.
1.66%
Below half SAND's 8.58%. Michael Burry sees significant shrinkage or inactivity vs. competitor.
26.22%
Higher Total Investments Growth compared to SAND's zero value, indicating better performance.
-58.40%
Higher Total Debt Growth compared to SAND's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-64.82%
Less than half of SAND's 14.06%. David Dodd sees better deleveraging or stronger cash buildup than competitor.