PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
527.41%
Cash & equivalents growing 527.41% while SAND's declined -3.34%. Peter Lynch would see this as a sign of superior liquidity management.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
527.41%
Below half of SAND's -3.34%. Michael Burry might suspect a liquidity shortfall if there's no alternative capital plan.
71.67%
Receivables growth less than half of SAND's -76.19%. David Dodd might see more conservative credit practices, provided revenue isn't suffering.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-42.89%
Higher Other Current Assets Growth compared to SAND's zero value, indicating worse performance.
487.28%
Below half of SAND's -2.69%. Michael Burry could suspect a liquidity squeeze. Verify operational performance.
41.04%
≥ 1.5x SAND's 2.73%. David Dodd sees more aggressive capex. Confirm it's not overspending.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
51.97%
Higher Long-Term Investments Growth compared to SAND's zero value, indicating better performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-48.70%
Higher Other Non-Current Assets Growth compared to SAND's zero value, indicating worse performance.
41.09%
≥ 1.5x SAND's 4.25%. David Dodd sees significantly higher long-term asset buildup. Confirm synergy with strategy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
57.25%
≥ 1.5x SAND's 0.84%. David Dodd notes a larger balance sheet expansion. Confirm it's not overleveraged.
-14.41%
Less than half of SAND's 2.71%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined AP approach or lower volume.
490.90%
Higher Short-Term Debt Growth compared to SAND's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
72.33%
Higher Deferred Revenue (Current) Growth compared to SAND's zero value, indicating better performance.
13656.68%
Higher Other Current Liabilities Growth compared to SAND's zero value, indicating worse performance.
768.73%
Above 1.5x SAND's 19.83%. Michael Burry sees a red flag for liquidity risk vs. competitor.
-5.88%
Higher Long-Term Debt Growth compared to SAND's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
185.85%
Above 1.5x SAND's 2.71%. Michael Burry sees a strong spike vs. competitor. Check coverage and debt ratios.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
316.69%
Above 1.5x SAND's 19.83%. Michael Burry sees a potential leverage warning sign.
28.06%
Higher Common Stock (Book Value) Growth compared to SAND's zero value, indicating worse performance.
12.94%
≥ 1.5x SAND's 2.20%. David Dodd sees higher yoy retained profits than competitor.
160.16%
Higher AOCI Growth compared to SAND's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
26.13%
≥ 1.5x SAND's 0.59%. David Dodd sees stronger capital base growth than competitor.
57.25%
≥ 1.5x SAND's 0.84%. David Dodd sees faster overall balance sheet growth than competitor.
51.97%
Higher Total Investments Growth compared to SAND's zero value, indicating better performance.
88.69%
Higher Total Debt Growth compared to SAND's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-121.47%
Less than half of SAND's 3.34%. David Dodd sees better deleveraging or stronger cash buildup than competitor.