95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
15.46%
Cash & equivalents yoy growth at least 1.5x SAND's 0.41%. Mohnish Pabrai might see this as a favorable liquidity edge, provided funds are well deployed.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
15.46%
Cash + STI yoy ≥ 1.5x SAND's 0.41%. David Dodd might see it as a strategic cash buffer advantage. Evaluate deployment plans.
47.50%
Receivables growth above 1.5x SAND's 23.54%. Michael Burry would check for potential credit bubble or inflated top-line.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
162.45%
Higher Other Current Assets Growth compared to SAND's zero value, indicating worse performance.
16.45%
≥ 1.5x SAND's 0.43%. David Dodd might see a short-term liquidity advantage or potential underutilized capital.
1.39%
Below half SAND's -0.05%. Michael Burry sees potential underinvestment risk unless there's a valid reason (asset-light model).
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
25.56%
Higher Long-Term Investments Growth compared to SAND's zero value, indicating better performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-5.26%
Higher Other Non-Current Assets Growth compared to SAND's zero value, indicating worse performance.
2.32%
≥ 1.5x SAND's 0.05%. David Dodd sees significantly higher long-term asset buildup. Confirm synergy with strategy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.08%
≥ 1.5x SAND's 0.22%. David Dodd notes a larger balance sheet expansion. Confirm it's not overleveraged.
-17.22%
Higher Accounts Payable Growth compared to SAND's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-82.32%
Higher Short-Term Debt Growth compared to SAND's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
15.16%
Less than half of SAND's -55.14%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined short-term liability approach.
-72.74%
Higher Long-Term Debt Growth compared to SAND's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.91%
Higher Total Non-Current Liabilities Growth compared to SAND's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.39%
Less than half of SAND's -55.14%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
13.71%
Below half SAND's -310.16%. Michael Burry suspects major net losses or high dividends vs. competitor.
-0.11%
Higher AOCI Growth compared to SAND's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.00%
≥ 1.5x SAND's 0.39%. David Dodd sees stronger capital base growth than competitor.
4.08%
≥ 1.5x SAND's 0.22%. David Dodd sees faster overall balance sheet growth than competitor.
25.56%
Higher Total Investments Growth compared to SAND's zero value, indicating better performance.
-75.82%
Higher Total Debt Growth compared to SAND's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-190.45%
Above 1.5x SAND's -0.41%. Michael Burry sees a major gap in net debt growth. Check coverage and liquidity.