PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
31.60%
Cash & equivalents growing 31.60% while SAND's declined -90.31%. Peter Lynch would see this as a sign of superior liquidity management.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
31.60%
Below half of SAND's -90.31%. Michael Burry might suspect a liquidity shortfall if there's no alternative capital plan.
10.31%
Receivables growth less than half of SAND's -26.47%. David Dodd might see more conservative credit practices, provided revenue isn't suffering.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
17.47%
Higher Other Current Assets Growth compared to SAND's zero value, indicating worse performance.
31.23%
Below half of SAND's -89.83%. Michael Burry could suspect a liquidity squeeze. Verify operational performance.
-0.37%
Below half SAND's 27.12%. Michael Burry sees potential underinvestment risk unless there's a valid reason (asset-light model).
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.66%
Both SAND and the company show zero Long-Term Investments Growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
22.82%
Less than half of SAND's 679.41%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in non-core assets. Possibly a simpler focus.
-0.65%
Below half of SAND's 26.70%. Michael Burry might suspect stagnation or lack of resources for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.63%
≥ 1.5x SAND's 1.32%. David Dodd notes a larger balance sheet expansion. Confirm it's not overleveraged.
-100.00%
Less than half of SAND's 29.28%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined AP approach or lower volume.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Higher Other Current Liabilities Growth compared to SAND's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-2.62%
Less than half of SAND's 29.28%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined short-term liability approach.
-9.08%
Higher Long-Term Debt Growth compared to SAND's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-51.09%
Higher Deferred Tax Liabilities (Non-Current) Growth compared to SAND's zero value, indicating worse performance.
1.68%
Higher Other Non-Current Liabilities Growth compared to SAND's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-2.73%
Higher Total Non-Current Liabilities Growth compared to SAND's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.68%
Less than half of SAND's 29.28%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-27.48%
Below half SAND's -297.91%. Michael Burry suspects major net losses or high dividends vs. competitor.
-28.30%
Less than half of SAND's 100.00%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible or market-driven swings than competitor.
302.42%
Higher Other Stockholders' Equity Items Growth compared to SAND's zero value, indicating worse performance.
5.84%
≥ 1.5x SAND's 1.15%. David Dodd sees stronger capital base growth than competitor.
4.63%
≥ 1.5x SAND's 1.32%. David Dodd sees faster overall balance sheet growth than competitor.
-2.66%
Both SAND and the company show zero Total Investments Growth.
-6.66%
Higher Total Debt Growth compared to SAND's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-44.35%
Less than half of SAND's 90.31%. David Dodd sees better deleveraging or stronger cash buildup than competitor.