PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
-14.46%
Cash & equivalents declining -14.46% while SAND's grows 12.16%. Howard Marks would question why our liquidity is shrinking while competitor builds cash.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-14.46%
Below half of SAND's 12.16%. Michael Burry might suspect a liquidity shortfall if there's no alternative capital plan.
-13.59%
Receivables growth less than half of SAND's 102.06%. David Dodd might see more conservative credit practices, provided revenue isn't suffering.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
38.11%
Higher Other Current Assets Growth compared to SAND's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-12.88%
Below half of SAND's 14.48%. Michael Burry could suspect a liquidity squeeze. Verify operational performance.
2.16%
≥ 1.5x SAND's 1.20%. David Dodd sees more aggressive capex. Confirm it's not overspending.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
19.96%
≥ 1.5x SAND's 5.10%. David Dodd sees an aggressive push into LT investments. Confirm risk management.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.30%
Less than half of SAND's 1650.92%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in non-core assets. Possibly a simpler focus.
2.33%
1.25-1.5x SAND's 2.12%. Bruce Berkowitz checks if expansions surpass competitor's pace but remain justified.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.98%
Below half of SAND's 5.42%. Michael Burry sees a potential red flag for stagnation or capital shortage.
-13.52%
Less than half of SAND's 2.69%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined AP approach or lower volume.
92.20%
Higher Short-Term Debt Growth compared to SAND's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Higher Deferred Revenue (Current) Growth compared to SAND's zero value, indicating better performance.
3392.34%
Less than half of SAND's -3.73%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in other current obligations.
108.45%
Above 1.5x SAND's 0.58%. Michael Burry sees a red flag for liquidity risk vs. competitor.
-0.04%
Higher Long-Term Debt Growth compared to SAND's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.83%
Less than half of SAND's -4.84%. David Dodd sees fewer additions to deferred tax liabilities vs. competitor.
-15.94%
Higher Other Non-Current Liabilities Growth compared to SAND's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-0.10%
Less than half of SAND's -4.84%. David Dodd sees a more conservative approach to non-current liabilities.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.14%
Less than half of SAND's -2.90%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
0.03%
Less than half of SAND's 6.15%. David Dodd sees fewer share issuances vs. competitor.
3.62%
Below half SAND's 12.90%. Michael Burry suspects major net losses or high dividends vs. competitor.
38.26%
Less than half of SAND's -39.38%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible or market-driven swings than competitor.
100.00%
Less than half of SAND's -6.15%. David Dodd notes simpler yoy equity changes vs. competitor.
1.93%
Below half SAND's 5.64%. Michael Burry sees potential underperformance in building shareholder capital.
1.98%
Below half SAND's 5.42%. Michael Burry sees significant shrinkage or inactivity vs. competitor.
19.96%
≥ 1.5x SAND's 5.10%. David Dodd sees far stronger investment expansions than competitor.
-0.04%
Higher Total Debt Growth compared to SAND's zero value, indicating worse performance.
1.49%
Less than half of SAND's -12.16%. David Dodd sees better deleveraging or stronger cash buildup than competitor.