95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
69.82%
Cash & equivalents yoy growth at least 1.5x SAND's 0.38%. Mohnish Pabrai might see this as a favorable liquidity edge, provided funds are well deployed.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
69.82%
Cash + STI yoy ≥ 1.5x SAND's 0.38%. David Dodd might see it as a strategic cash buffer advantage. Evaluate deployment plans.
57.80%
Receivables growth less than half of SAND's -9.63%. David Dodd might see more conservative credit practices, provided revenue isn't suffering.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
53.43%
Higher Other Current Assets Growth compared to SAND's zero value, indicating worse performance.
68.76%
Below half of SAND's -0.08%. Michael Burry could suspect a liquidity squeeze. Verify operational performance.
-0.80%
Below half SAND's 9.78%. Michael Burry sees potential underinvestment risk unless there's a valid reason (asset-light model).
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
39.01%
Below half of SAND's 95.36%. Michael Burry sees possible underinvestment in long-term assets. Verify capital constraints.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-5.59%
Less than half of SAND's 58.68%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in non-core assets. Possibly a simpler focus.
-0.36%
Below half of SAND's 19.66%. Michael Burry might suspect stagnation or lack of resources for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.00%
Below half of SAND's 13.93%. Michael Burry sees a potential red flag for stagnation or capital shortage.
2.57%
Less than half of SAND's 46.28%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined AP approach or lower volume.
29.86%
Higher Short-Term Debt Growth compared to SAND's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-107.58%
Less than half of SAND's 5.99%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in other current obligations.
-54.83%
Less than half of SAND's 97.34%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined short-term liability approach.
0.02%
Higher Long-Term Debt Growth compared to SAND's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-42.21%
Less than half of SAND's 1.46%. David Dodd sees fewer additions to deferred tax liabilities vs. competitor.
3.37%
Higher Other Non-Current Liabilities Growth compared to SAND's zero value, indicating worse performance.
0.04%
Less than half of SAND's 1.46%. David Dodd sees a more conservative approach to non-current liabilities.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.28%
Less than half of SAND's 37.09%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
0.54%
Less than half of SAND's 12.11%. David Dodd sees fewer share issuances vs. competitor.
2.49%
Below half SAND's 11.87%. Michael Burry suspects major net losses or high dividends vs. competitor.
122.92%
Above 1.5x SAND's 0.06%. Michael Burry sees a significant jump in intangible or market-based gains. Scrutinize risk of reversal.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.00%
Below half SAND's 13.38%. Michael Burry sees potential underperformance in building shareholder capital.
1.00%
Below half SAND's 13.93%. Michael Burry sees significant shrinkage or inactivity vs. competitor.
39.01%
Below half SAND's 95.36%. Michael Burry suspects major underinvestment or forced divestment.
0.02%
Higher Total Debt Growth compared to SAND's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-6.22%
Less than half of SAND's 1.60%. David Dodd sees better deleveraging or stronger cash buildup than competitor.