95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
-18.31%
Cash & equivalents declining -18.31% while SAND's grows 34.66%. Howard Marks would question why our liquidity is shrinking while competitor builds cash.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-18.31%
Below half of SAND's 34.66%. Michael Burry might suspect a liquidity shortfall if there's no alternative capital plan.
3.32%
Receivables growth less than half of SAND's 18.27%. David Dodd might see more conservative credit practices, provided revenue isn't suffering.
-100.00%
Higher Inventory Growth compared to SAND's zero value, indicating worse performance.
25.44%
Higher Other Current Assets Growth compared to SAND's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-16.94%
Below half of SAND's 33.05%. Michael Burry could suspect a liquidity squeeze. Verify operational performance.
-0.97%
Below half SAND's -8.35%. Michael Burry sees potential underinvestment risk unless there's a valid reason (asset-light model).
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.75%
Below half of SAND's 58.71%. Michael Burry sees possible underinvestment in long-term assets. Verify capital constraints.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
10.63%
Above 1.5x SAND's 1.30%. Michael Burry warns of potential hidden liabilities or intangible bloat.
-0.95%
Below half of SAND's -6.08%. Michael Burry might suspect stagnation or lack of resources for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.23%
0.5-0.75x SAND's -2.17%. Martin Whitman worries about slower asset growth than competitor. Is it strategy or constraint?
4.56%
50-75% of SAND's 7.21%. Bruce Berkowitz notes the company is paying suppliers faster or not stretching terms as competitor does.
-33.56%
Higher Short-Term Debt Growth compared to SAND's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-111.92%
Higher Other Current Liabilities Growth compared to SAND's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-52.94%
Less than half of SAND's 7.21%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined short-term liability approach.
-10.63%
Higher Long-Term Debt Growth compared to SAND's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.26%
Less than half of SAND's -0.47%. David Dodd sees fewer additions to deferred tax liabilities vs. competitor.
26.26%
Higher Other Non-Current Liabilities Growth compared to SAND's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-10.53%
Above 1.5x SAND's -0.47%. Michael Burry sees a strong spike vs. competitor. Check coverage and debt ratios.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-12.48%
Less than half of SAND's 2.87%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
0.20%
Less than half of SAND's 0.74%. David Dodd sees fewer share issuances vs. competitor.
1.14%
Below half SAND's -78.92%. Michael Burry suspects major net losses or high dividends vs. competitor.
42.60%
Above 1.5x SAND's 2.53%. Michael Burry sees a significant jump in intangible or market-based gains. Scrutinize risk of reversal.
-0.20%
Less than half of SAND's -0.74%. David Dodd notes simpler yoy equity changes vs. competitor.
0.91%
Below half SAND's -2.28%. Michael Burry sees potential underperformance in building shareholder capital.
-1.23%
0.5-0.75x SAND's -2.17%. Martin Whitman sees underexpansion or possible missed opportunities.
-1.75%
Below half SAND's 58.71%. Michael Burry suspects major underinvestment or forced divestment.
-10.63%
Higher Total Debt Growth compared to SAND's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-9.67%
Less than half of SAND's -34.66%. David Dodd sees better deleveraging or stronger cash buildup than competitor.