PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
11.99%
Cash & equivalents growing 11.99% while SAND's declined -9.86%. Peter Lynch would see this as a sign of superior liquidity management.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
11.99%
Below half of SAND's -9.86%. Michael Burry might suspect a liquidity shortfall if there's no alternative capital plan.
-16.89%
Similar receivables growth to SAND's -21.71%. Walter Schloss would see comparable credit policies, investigating any subtle differences in sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-17.16%
Higher Other Current Assets Growth compared to SAND's zero value, indicating worse performance.
10.35%
Below half of SAND's -10.90%. Michael Burry could suspect a liquidity squeeze. Verify operational performance.
-3.85%
≥ 1.5x SAND's -1.64%. David Dodd sees more aggressive capex. Confirm it's not overspending.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-28.98%
Below half of SAND's 3.53%. Michael Burry sees possible underinvestment in long-term assets. Verify capital constraints.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
12.34%
1.1-1.25x SAND's 10.94%. Bill Ackman questions if the firm invests in intangible or other non-core areas more aggressively.
-3.94%
≥ 1.5x SAND's -0.45%. David Dodd sees significantly higher long-term asset buildup. Confirm synergy with strategy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.73%
≥ 1.5x SAND's -1.87%. David Dodd notes a larger balance sheet expansion. Confirm it's not overleveraged.
-2.15%
Less than half of SAND's -12.11%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined AP approach or lower volume.
-25.51%
Higher Short-Term Debt Growth compared to SAND's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
31.69%
Higher Deferred Revenue (Current) Growth compared to SAND's zero value, indicating better performance.
18.10%
Higher Other Current Liabilities Growth compared to SAND's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-6.07%
50-75% of SAND's -12.11%. Bruce Berkowitz notes the firm keeps current liabilities growth relatively low.
-9.51%
Higher Long-Term Debt Growth compared to SAND's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
12.50%
Less than half of SAND's -10.31%. David Dodd sees fewer additions to deferred tax liabilities vs. competitor.
-8.47%
Higher Other Non-Current Liabilities Growth compared to SAND's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-9.51%
Similar yoy to SAND's -10.31%. Walter Schloss sees parallel expansions in long-term liabilities.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-9.42%
Similar yoy to SAND's -11.12%. Walter Schloss sees parallel expansions in total liabilities.
-0.11%
Less than half of SAND's 0.02%. David Dodd sees fewer share issuances vs. competitor.
-6.96%
Below half SAND's -17.94%. Michael Burry suspects major net losses or high dividends vs. competitor.
-27.25%
Above 1.5x SAND's -5.77%. Michael Burry sees a significant jump in intangible or market-based gains. Scrutinize risk of reversal.
100.00%
Less than half of SAND's -0.02%. David Dodd notes simpler yoy equity changes vs. competitor.
-2.80%
≥ 1.5x SAND's -1.65%. David Dodd sees stronger capital base growth than competitor.
-3.73%
≥ 1.5x SAND's -1.87%. David Dodd sees faster overall balance sheet growth than competitor.
-28.98%
Below half SAND's 3.53%. Michael Burry suspects major underinvestment or forced divestment.
-9.51%
Higher Total Debt Growth compared to SAND's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-11.91%
Less than half of SAND's 9.86%. David Dodd sees better deleveraging or stronger cash buildup than competitor.