PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
17.30%
Cash & equivalents growing 17.30% while SAND's declined -69.66%. Peter Lynch would see this as a sign of superior liquidity management.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
17.30%
Below half of SAND's -87.65%. Michael Burry might suspect a liquidity shortfall if there's no alternative capital plan.
-61.08%
Receivables growth less than half of SAND's 5.67%. David Dodd might see more conservative credit practices, provided revenue isn't suffering.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
43.94%
Higher Other Current Assets Growth compared to SAND's zero value, indicating worse performance.
15.32%
Below half of SAND's -69.24%. Michael Burry could suspect a liquidity squeeze. Verify operational performance.
-1.05%
Below half SAND's 8.98%. Michael Burry sees potential underinvestment risk unless there's a valid reason (asset-light model).
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.35%
Below half of SAND's -8.63%. Michael Burry sees possible underinvestment in long-term assets. Verify capital constraints.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.23%
Less than half of SAND's 68.87%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in non-core assets. Possibly a simpler focus.
-1.10%
Below half of SAND's 2.08%. Michael Burry might suspect stagnation or lack of resources for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.80%
Below half of SAND's -2.06%. Michael Burry sees a potential red flag for stagnation or capital shortage.
-36.91%
Above 1.5x SAND's -22.69%. Michael Burry questions if payables are being stretched to avoid short-term borrowing.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
159204.00%
Higher Other Current Liabilities Growth compared to SAND's zero value, indicating worse performance.
291.74%
Less than half of SAND's -22.69%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined short-term liability approach.
-13.90%
Higher Long-Term Debt Growth compared to SAND's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
13.16%
Less than half of SAND's -73.32%. David Dodd sees fewer additions to deferred tax liabilities vs. competitor.
13.22%
Higher Other Non-Current Liabilities Growth compared to SAND's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-13.85%
Above 1.5x SAND's -2.07%. Michael Burry sees a strong spike vs. competitor. Check coverage and debt ratios.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-9.12%
50-75% of SAND's -16.43%. Bruce Berkowitz notes a lower yoy liability increase.
0.04%
Less than half of SAND's 0.81%. David Dodd sees fewer share issuances vs. competitor.
2.09%
1.25-1.5x SAND's 1.48%. Bruce Berkowitz notes stronger reinvestment strategy.
-4.95%
Less than half of SAND's -105.71%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible or market-driven swings than competitor.
-0.04%
Less than half of SAND's -0.81%. David Dodd notes simpler yoy equity changes vs. competitor.
0.53%
Below half SAND's -1.85%. Michael Burry sees potential underperformance in building shareholder capital.
-0.80%
Below half SAND's -2.06%. Michael Burry sees significant shrinkage or inactivity vs. competitor.
-3.35%
Below half SAND's -15.13%. Michael Burry suspects major underinvestment or forced divestment.
-13.90%
Higher Total Debt Growth compared to SAND's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-18.47%
Less than half of SAND's 85.61%. David Dodd sees better deleveraging or stronger cash buildup than competitor.