95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
10.25%
Cash & equivalents growing 10.25% while SAND's declined -61.56%. Peter Lynch would see this as a sign of superior liquidity management.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
10.25%
Below half of SAND's -47.30%. Michael Burry might suspect a liquidity shortfall if there's no alternative capital plan.
-31.31%
Receivables growth less than half of SAND's 96.75%. David Dodd might see more conservative credit practices, provided revenue isn't suffering.
-5.56%
Higher Inventory Growth compared to SAND's zero value, indicating worse performance.
315.73%
Other current assets growth < half of SAND's 756.50%. David Dodd sees a leaner approach to short-term items.
8.90%
0.75-0.9x SAND's 10.70%. Bill Ackman would ask if competitor is building short-term resources more aggressively.
-0.58%
Below half SAND's 276.04%. Michael Burry sees potential underinvestment risk unless there's a valid reason (asset-light model).
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.90%
Higher Intangible Assets Growth compared to SAND's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-3.90%
Higher Goodwill + Intangibles Growth compared to SAND's zero value, indicating worse performance.
216.09%
≥ 1.5x SAND's 21.49%. David Dodd sees an aggressive push into LT investments. Confirm risk management.
-46.75%
Higher Tax Assets Growth compared to SAND's zero value, indicating worse performance.
311.74%
Less than half of SAND's -83.21%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in non-core assets. Possibly a simpler focus.
1.61%
Below half of SAND's 201.09%. Michael Burry might suspect stagnation or lack of resources for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.15%
Below half of SAND's 190.95%. Michael Burry sees a potential red flag for stagnation or capital shortage.
18.10%
Less than half of SAND's -99.42%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined AP approach or lower volume.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6253.61%
Higher Other Current Liabilities Growth compared to SAND's zero value, indicating worse performance.
27.57%
Less than half of SAND's 122.41%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined short-term liability approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
727.97%
Less than half of SAND's -41.83%. David Dodd sees fewer additions to deferred tax liabilities vs. competitor.
12.39%
Higher Other Non-Current Liabilities Growth compared to SAND's zero value, indicating worse performance.
7.40%
Less than half of SAND's 1924.72%. David Dodd sees a more conservative approach to non-current liabilities.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
21.60%
Less than half of SAND's 1299.26%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
0.32%
Less than half of SAND's 75.83%. David Dodd sees fewer share issuances vs. competitor.
4.67%
Below half SAND's 34.62%. Michael Burry suspects major net losses or high dividends vs. competitor.
-39.18%
Less than half of SAND's 98.25%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible or market-driven swings than competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.06%
Below half SAND's 113.80%. Michael Burry sees potential underperformance in building shareholder capital.
2.15%
Below half SAND's 190.95%. Michael Burry sees significant shrinkage or inactivity vs. competitor.
216.09%
≥ 1.5x SAND's 20.71%. David Dodd sees far stronger investment expansions than competitor.
-11.95%
Less than half of SAND's 22591.76%. David Dodd sees less overall debt expansion vs. competitor.
-10.37%
Less than half of SAND's 3300.94%. David Dodd sees better deleveraging or stronger cash buildup than competitor.