95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
-43.76%
Both companies show declining cash positions (-43.76% vs SAND's -38.49%). Seth Klarman would examine if this reflects broader market conditions or operational challenges.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-43.76%
Cash + STI yoy 0.75-0.9x SAND's -54.30%. Bill Ackman would wonder if competitor is building liquidity more aggressively.
-48.46%
Receivables growth less than half of SAND's 15.39%. David Dodd might see more conservative credit practices, provided revenue isn't suffering.
-100.00%
Inventory growth below half of SAND's 100.00%. David Dodd would check if that's due to efficiency or supply constraints.
-90.76%
Above 1.5x SAND's -44.44%. Michael Burry might investigate for potential short-term asset misclassification or risk.
-43.22%
1.25-1.5x SAND's -34.48%. Bruce Berkowitz checks if strong current asset growth is used effectively.
6.96%
Below half SAND's -2.25%. Michael Burry sees potential underinvestment risk unless there's a valid reason (asset-light model).
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-72.00%
Higher Intangible Assets Growth compared to SAND's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-72.00%
Higher Goodwill + Intangibles Growth compared to SAND's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-1.12%
Below half of SAND's 5.29%. Michael Burry sees possible underinvestment in long-term assets. Verify capital constraints.
-0.49%
Higher Tax Assets Growth compared to SAND's zero value, indicating worse performance.
28.38%
Less than half of SAND's 361.46%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in non-core assets. Possibly a simpler focus.
6.55%
≥ 1.5x SAND's 0.15%. David Dodd sees significantly higher long-term asset buildup. Confirm synergy with strategy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.54%
Below half of SAND's -0.81%. Michael Burry sees a potential red flag for stagnation or capital shortage.
-18.87%
Less than half of SAND's 170.77%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined AP approach or lower volume.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3509428500.00%
Below half of SAND's -154.68%. Michael Burry suspects a big gap in pre-sales traction.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
238.71%
Less than half of SAND's -3.51%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined short-term liability approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
80.58%
Higher Non-Current Deferred Revenue Growth compared to SAND's zero value, indicating better performance.
-0.29%
Less than half of SAND's -43.87%. David Dodd sees fewer additions to deferred tax liabilities vs. competitor.
-1.87%
Less than half of SAND's 102.49%. David Dodd notes more conservative expansions in non-current obligations.
-24.58%
Above 1.5x SAND's -3.62%. Michael Burry sees a strong spike vs. competitor. Check coverage and debt ratios.
-100.00%
Higher Other Liabilities Growth compared to SAND's zero value, indicating worse performance.
108.55%
Less than half of SAND's -3.62%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
0.61%
1.1-1.25x SAND's 0.53%. Bill Ackman questions if the firm is issuing more stock than competitor.
3.31%
Below half SAND's -6.61%. Michael Burry suspects major net losses or high dividends vs. competitor.
-6.28%
Less than half of SAND's 47.25%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible or market-driven swings than competitor.
21.34%
Less than half of SAND's 100.00%. David Dodd notes simpler yoy equity changes vs. competitor.
1.76%
≥ 1.5x SAND's 0.12%. David Dodd sees stronger capital base growth than competitor.
2.54%
Below half SAND's -0.81%. Michael Burry sees significant shrinkage or inactivity vs. competitor.
-1.12%
≥ 1.5x SAND's -0.30%. David Dodd sees far stronger investment expansions than competitor.
-4.23%
Above 1.5x SAND's -2.55%. Michael Burry sees a major jump. Investigate leverage rationale.
44.22%
Less than half of SAND's -2.15%. David Dodd sees better deleveraging or stronger cash buildup than competitor.