PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
29.69%
Net income growth under 50% of AEM's 469.00%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
35.54%
Some D&A expansion while AEM is negative at -1548.26%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
61.18%
Some yoy growth while AEM is negative at -273.88%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
-100.00%
Negative yoy SBC while AEM is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
-63.57%
Both reduce yoy usage, with AEM at -832.45%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-63.57%
Both reduce yoy usage, with AEM at -232.06%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
-156.85%
Both negative yoy, with AEM at -177.92%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
26.93%
Some CFO growth while AEM is negative at -13.22%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-287.74%
Negative yoy purchasing while AEM stands at 161.29%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
98.42%
We have some outflow growth while AEM is negative at -228.82%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
96.41%
Investing outflow well above AEM's 0.33%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
168.90%
Lower share issuance yoy vs. AEM's 708.42%, implying less dilution. David Dodd would confirm the firm still has enough capital for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.