PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
82.05%
Some net income increase while AEM is negative at -1482.72%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
104.09%
D&A growth well above AEM's 49.97%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
100.00%
Some yoy growth while AEM is negative at -42.96%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
-24.94%
Both cut yoy SBC, with AEM at -33.21%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
-260.68%
Both reduce yoy usage, with AEM at -91.08%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-4.00%
Both negative yoy, with AEM at -15.60%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
71.55%
Some CFO growth while AEM is negative at -152.28%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-16656.97%
Both yoy lines negative, with AEM at -11.50%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-38.41%
We reduce yoy other investing while AEM is 73.53%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-16197.05%
We reduce yoy invests while AEM stands at 9.74%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Buyback growth of 100.00% while AEM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.