PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-12.16%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with AEM at -53.41%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
-9.55%
Negative yoy D&A while AEM is 40.82%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
154.30%
Some yoy growth while AEM is negative at -28.92%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
345.27%
SBC growth well above AEM's 189.41%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
-212.21%
Negative yoy working capital usage while AEM is 60.22%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-88.61%
Negative yoy while AEM is 97.43%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-18.85%
Negative yoy CFO while AEM is 38.71%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
76.26%
CapEx growth well above AEM's 35.31%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
100.00%
Acquisition growth of 100.00% while AEM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
95.25%
We have some outflow growth while AEM is negative at -102.68%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
72.46%
Investing outflow well above AEM's 14.58%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
95.15%
Debt repayment above 1.5x AEM's 29.14%, indicating stronger deleveraging. David Dodd would verify if expansions are not neglected.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.