PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
19.33%
Net income growth under 50% of AEM's 349.40%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
13.29%
Less D&A growth vs. AEM's 44.26%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
-342.07%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
-35.10%
Both cut yoy SBC, with AEM at -26.38%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
12.04%
Less working capital growth vs. AEM's 225.69%, indicating potentially more efficient day-to-day cash usage. David Dodd would confirm no negative impact on revenue.
100.00%
AR growth while AEM is negative at -61.62%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
100.00%
Inventory growth well above AEM's 37.09%. Michael Burry would suspect potential future write-down risk if demand does not materialize.
100.00%
AP growth of 100.00% while AEM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might matter for short-term liquidity if expansions are large.
-100.00%
Negative yoy usage while AEM is 339.89%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
92.91%
Some yoy increase while AEM is negative at -249.23%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
16.30%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of AEM's 116.90%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
100.00%
Some CapEx rise while AEM is negative at -3.96%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1640.44%
Negative yoy purchasing while AEM stands at 97.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-5926.89%
Both yoy lines negative, with AEM at -6.15%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-1645.23%
We reduce yoy invests while AEM stands at 2.10%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Buyback growth of 100.00% while AEM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.