95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
21.19%
Net income growth under 50% of AEM's 52.05%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
25.94%
Some D&A expansion while AEM is negative at -4.35%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
189.32%
Well above AEM's 91.86% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
44.54%
SBC growth while AEM is negative at -50.23%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
78.15%
Slight usage while AEM is negative at -95.33%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
19.73%
AR growth while AEM is negative at -83.70%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
96.72%
Some inventory rise while AEM is negative at -126.98%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
12.50%
AP growth of 12.50% while AEM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might matter for short-term liquidity if expansions are large.
-169.29%
Negative yoy usage while AEM is 4731.07%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
3888.06%
Some yoy increase while AEM is negative at -54.79%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
32.30%
Some CFO growth while AEM is negative at -4.81%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
85.96%
Some CapEx rise while AEM is negative at -18.12%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both yoy lines are negative, with AEM at -77.47%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
-212.50%
Both yoy lines negative, with AEM at -409.15%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-165.87%
Both yoy lines negative, with AEM at -29.14%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.