PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-15.36%
Negative net income growth while AEM stands at 145.72%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
-32.92%
Negative yoy D&A while AEM is 3.03%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-85.55%
Negative yoy deferred tax while AEM stands at 42.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
25.51%
SBC growth while AEM is negative at -5.90%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
-230.54%
Both reduce yoy usage, with AEM at -146.87%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-1258.62%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with AEM at -107.68%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-175.87%
Both negative yoy AP, with AEM at -25.15%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
211.90%
Some yoy usage while AEM is negative at -101.92%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
-575.00%
Negative yoy while AEM is 184.08%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-25.60%
Negative yoy CFO while AEM is 2.77%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Acquisition growth of 100.00% while AEM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
100.00%
Purchases growth of 100.00% while AEM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-206.82%
Both yoy lines negative, with AEM at -164.06%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-103909.45%
Both yoy lines negative, with AEM at -77.56%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.