95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-15.01%
Negative net income growth while AEM stands at 124.01%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
-7.74%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with AEM at -7.88%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
99.69%
Well above AEM's 117.15% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
58.11%
SBC growth well above AEM's 38.95%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
-307.43%
Negative yoy working capital usage while AEM is 714.24%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-137.52%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with AEM at -127.26%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1059.54%
Negative yoy AP while AEM is 65.43%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
-179.78%
Negative yoy usage while AEM is 130.69%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-7.83%
Negative yoy CFO while AEM is 82.23%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
-823.53%
Negative yoy CapEx while AEM is 25.77%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.42%
Less 'other investing' outflow yoy vs. AEM's 24.46%. David Dodd would see a stronger short-term cash position unless competitor invests more wisely.
-672.38%
We reduce yoy invests while AEM stands at 23.30%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
100.00%
We repay more while AEM is negative at -4144.01%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.