PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-76.45%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with AEM at -1300.70%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
50.21%
Some D&A expansion while AEM is negative at -0.53%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
77.37%
Some yoy growth while AEM is negative at -197.54%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
159.27%
SBC growth while AEM is negative at -21.09%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
552.58%
Well above AEM's 137.98% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
12.24%
AR growth while AEM is negative at -103.28%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
169.03%
A yoy AP increase while AEM is negative at -171.11%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
50.75%
Lower 'other working capital' growth vs. AEM's 143.84%. David Dodd would see fewer unexpected short-term demands on cash.
50.41%
Some yoy increase while AEM is negative at -93.12%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
34.00%
Some CFO growth while AEM is negative at -2.05%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-160715.36%
Both yoy lines negative, with AEM at -8.62%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
19.03%
Growth well above AEM's 5.77%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
-18875.02%
Both yoy lines negative, with AEM at -15.36%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
69.12%
Debt repayment above 1.5x AEM's 27.58%, indicating stronger deleveraging. David Dodd would verify if expansions are not neglected.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-422.95%
We cut yoy buybacks while AEM is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.