PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-89.31%
Negative net income growth while AEM stands at 242.98%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
3.58%
D&A growth well above AEM's 3.89%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
127.08%
Some yoy growth while AEM is negative at -184.63%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
-72.04%
Both cut yoy SBC, with AEM at -6.61%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
266.55%
Well above AEM's 55.72% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
223.37%
AR growth is negative or stable vs. AEM's 1803.14%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd would confirm it doesn't hamper sales volume.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-174.73%
Negative yoy AP while AEM is 76.59%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
144.39%
Growth well above AEM's 100.56%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
101.73%
Well above AEM's 85.16%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
-19.81%
Negative yoy CFO while AEM is 14.56%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
16.94%
Some CapEx rise while AEM is negative at -24.13%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
-377.07%
Both yoy lines negative, with AEM at -100.00%. Martin Whitman sees an overall caution or integration phase for both companies’ expansions.
-377.07%
Negative yoy purchasing while AEM stands at 58.81%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-79.34%
Both yoy lines are negative, with AEM at -99.26%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
108.52%
We have some outflow growth while AEM is negative at -100.38%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
-21.74%
Both yoy lines negative, with AEM at -54.85%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
64.56%
Debt repayment above 1.5x AEM's 0.97%, indicating stronger deleveraging. David Dodd would verify if expansions are not neglected.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.