PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
2.06%
Net income growth under 50% of AEM's 332.64%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
0.46%
Less D&A growth vs. AEM's 4.90%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
-25.34%
Negative yoy deferred tax while AEM stands at 238.41%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-31.81%
Negative yoy SBC while AEM is 22.21%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
-645.44%
Both reduce yoy usage, with AEM at -108.62%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
52.36%
AR growth is negative or stable vs. AEM's 148.21%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd would confirm it doesn't hamper sales volume.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-335.70%
Both reduce yoy usage, with AEM at -34.67%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
126.03%
Some yoy increase while AEM is negative at -5771.69%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
-7.33%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with AEM at -26.28%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
-100.79%
Negative yoy CapEx while AEM is 22.54%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-90.70%
We reduce yoy sales while AEM is 420.22%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
-220.41%
We reduce yoy other investing while AEM is 30.76%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-143.26%
We reduce yoy invests while AEM stands at 31.98%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
-69.38%
We cut debt repayment yoy while AEM is 94.10%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.