PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
4.90%
Some net income increase while AEM is negative at -7.83%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
-1.33%
Negative yoy D&A while AEM is 1.03%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-14030.23%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
-87.74%
Negative yoy SBC while AEM is 29.26%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
-147.76%
Both reduce yoy usage, with AEM at -40.69%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
134.82%
AR growth while AEM is negative at -9.89%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8.24%
Some yoy usage while AEM is negative at -6.01%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
-202.13%
Negative yoy while AEM is 53.67%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-8.83%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with AEM at -12.76%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
64.30%
Some CapEx rise while AEM is negative at -15.05%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Some yoy expansion while AEM is negative at -98.76%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
129.23%
Proceeds from sales/maturities above 1.5x AEM's 35.38%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is capitalizing on strong valuations or freeing liquidity for expansions.
69.70%
We have some outflow growth while AEM is negative at -40.96%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
200.22%
We have mild expansions while AEM is negative at -19.97%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
-91.19%
We cut debt repayment yoy while AEM is 98.32%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.