PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
2.54%
Net income growth under 50% of AEM's 39.23%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
0.18%
Some D&A expansion while AEM is negative at -3.21%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
-76.49%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
-649.14%
Both cut yoy SBC, with AEM at -24.91%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
-295.69%
Negative yoy working capital usage while AEM is 57.12%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-3131.59%
AR is negative yoy while AEM is 101.93%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
147.24%
Lower AP growth vs. AEM's 501.18%, indicating prompt payments. David Dodd would confirm no lost opportunity in interest-free credit if expansions are underfunded.
-1616.70%
Both reduce yoy usage, with AEM at -12.48%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
-919.60%
Both negative yoy, with AEM at -86.01%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
-6.78%
Negative yoy CFO while AEM is 14.18%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
58.29%
CapEx growth well above AEM's 11.89%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-214.58%
Both yoy lines negative, with AEM at -204.60%. Martin Whitman would suspect an environment with fewer attractive securities or a strategic pivot to internal growth.
-101.56%
We reduce yoy sales while AEM is 233.74%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
-188.06%
We reduce yoy other investing while AEM is 122.08%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-56.08%
We reduce yoy invests while AEM stands at 62.56%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
99.91%
Debt repayment above 1.5x AEM's 55.16%, indicating stronger deleveraging. David Dodd would verify if expansions are not neglected.
-86.06%
Negative yoy issuance while AEM is 4.82%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.