PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-18.77%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with AEM at -39.61%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
-21.66%
Negative yoy D&A while AEM is 9.74%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
148.87%
Well above AEM's 3.05% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
146.24%
SBC growth while AEM is negative at -0.69%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
156.82%
Slight usage while AEM is negative at -386.23%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
137.26%
AR growth is negative or stable vs. AEM's 3791.95%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd would confirm it doesn't hamper sales volume.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
208.44%
A yoy AP increase while AEM is negative at -50.18%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
202.40%
Growth well above AEM's 77.52%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
166.77%
Lower 'other non-cash' growth vs. AEM's 955.11%, indicating steadier reported figures. David Dodd would confirm no missed necessary write-downs or gains.
-6.99%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with AEM at -28.50%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
97.21%
Some CapEx rise while AEM is negative at -19.72%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-113.55%
Negative yoy purchasing while AEM stands at 10.80%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
138.24%
We have some liquidation growth while AEM is negative at -76.44%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
84.20%
We have some outflow growth while AEM is negative at -97.80%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
89.72%
We have mild expansions while AEM is negative at -32.58%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
-13.29%
Both yoy lines negative, with AEM at -1.61%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting net new borrowings or weaker paydowns across the niche.
-68.20%
Negative yoy issuance while AEM is 0.13%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.