95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
116.27%
Some net income increase while AEM is negative at -11.68%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
7.88%
Some D&A expansion while AEM is negative at -0.40%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
58.43%
Some yoy growth while AEM is negative at -50.20%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
33.34%
SBC growth while AEM is negative at -5.04%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
-161.59%
Negative yoy working capital usage while AEM is 39.31%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-146.54%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with AEM at -119.11%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-124.51%
Both negative yoy AP, with AEM at -350.86%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
-182.38%
Negative yoy usage while AEM is 402.35%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-8516.17%
Both negative yoy, with AEM at -87.75%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
-2.98%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with AEM at -10.05%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
-16744.65%
Negative yoy CapEx while AEM is 3.15%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.10%
Purchases well above AEM's 31.07%. Michael Burry would see major cash outflow into securities vs. competitor’s approach, risking near-term FCF.
2516.86%
Proceeds from sales/maturities above 1.5x AEM's 2.59%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is capitalizing on strong valuations or freeing liquidity for expansions.
144.26%
Growth well above AEM's 224.85%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
-4026.39%
We reduce yoy invests while AEM stands at 5.65%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
-0.51%
Both yoy lines negative, with AEM at -36.58%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting net new borrowings or weaker paydowns across the niche.
932.90%
We slightly raise equity while AEM is negative at -2.75%. John Neff sees competitor possibly preserving share count or buying back shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.