PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-15.44%
Negative net income growth while AEM stands at 157.41%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
-4.62%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with AEM at -1.28%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
-203.03%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
9953.49%
SBC growth while AEM is negative at -59.74%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
14.17%
Slight usage while AEM is negative at -715.19%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
-1.54%
AR is negative yoy while AEM is 90.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
388.85%
Inventory growth well above AEM's 65.49%. Michael Burry would suspect potential future write-down risk if demand does not materialize.
-14.78%
Both negative yoy AP, with AEM at -152.79%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
-37.48%
Both reduce yoy usage, with AEM at -107.15%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
57.18%
Some yoy increase while AEM is negative at -123.20%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
11.35%
Some CFO growth while AEM is negative at -33.88%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
283.86%
CapEx growth well above AEM's 7.99%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
79.73%
Some yoy expansion while AEM is negative at -144.49%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-99.14%
We reduce yoy other investing while AEM is 103.15%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
284.00%
Investing outflow well above AEM's 6.06%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
1.99%
Debt repayment well below AEM's 91.98%. Michael Burry suspects heavier leverage risk or insufficient cash generation to keep pace.
4483.93%
We slightly raise equity while AEM is negative at -7.48%. John Neff sees competitor possibly preserving share count or buying back shares.
-4483.93%
We cut yoy buybacks while AEM is 90.88%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.