PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-32.95%
Negative net income growth while AEM stands at 786.25%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
-15.21%
Negative yoy D&A while AEM is 12.70%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
46.81%
Some yoy growth while AEM is negative at -5.54%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
-12.71%
Negative yoy SBC while AEM is 136.54%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
-138.38%
Negative yoy working capital usage while AEM is 138.86%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-57.16%
AR is negative yoy while AEM is 445.47%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
-60.23%
Negative yoy inventory while AEM is 103.76%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
-369.57%
Negative yoy AP while AEM is 81.11%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
-116.73%
Negative yoy usage while AEM is 511.64%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
92.37%
Some yoy increase while AEM is negative at -4638.11%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
-21.46%
Negative yoy CFO while AEM is 70.73%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
-136.94%
Negative yoy CapEx while AEM is 3.97%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
100.00%
Some acquisitions while AEM is negative at -8525.75%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pausing M&A or divesting while the firm invests in new deals.
-3857.59%
Both yoy lines negative, with AEM at -22.12%. Martin Whitman would suspect an environment with fewer attractive securities or a strategic pivot to internal growth.
-100.00%
We reduce yoy sales while AEM is 106.72%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
-5988.89%
We reduce yoy other investing while AEM is 248.13%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-146.85%
Both yoy lines negative, with AEM at -238.94%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
-2.54%
Both yoy lines negative, with AEM at -11313.69%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting net new borrowings or weaker paydowns across the niche.
233.43%
Stock issuance far above AEM's 39.43%. Michael Burry flags a significant dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach unless ROI is very high.
100.00%
We have some buyback growth while AEM is negative at -191.34%. John Neff sees a short-term advantage in boosting EPS unless expansions hamper competitor.