PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
26.98%
Some net income increase while AEM is negative at -82.01%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
6.16%
Less D&A growth vs. AEM's 25.43%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
193.24%
Some yoy growth while AEM is negative at -79.31%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
-39.38%
Negative yoy SBC while AEM is 1.77%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
181.32%
Slight usage while AEM is negative at -29.00%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
151.10%
AR growth while AEM is negative at -134.90%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
-70.23%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with AEM at -1493.38%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
113.08%
Lower AP growth vs. AEM's 1587.52%, indicating prompt payments. David Dodd would confirm no lost opportunity in interest-free credit if expansions are underfunded.
-1069.64%
Both reduce yoy usage, with AEM at -226.02%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
111.57%
Well above AEM's 97.70%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
49.79%
Operating cash flow growth above 1.5x AEM's 11.14%. David Dodd would confirm superior cost control or stronger revenue-to-cash conversion.
-174.62%
Both yoy lines negative, with AEM at -10.05%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
99.62%
Some yoy expansion while AEM is negative at -99.68%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-128.11%
We reduce yoy other investing while AEM is 12.33%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-3.55%
We reduce yoy invests while AEM stands at 67.81%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
12.38%
Debt repayment well below AEM's 58.25%. Michael Burry suspects heavier leverage risk or insufficient cash generation to keep pace.
-88.06%
Negative yoy issuance while AEM is 10.57%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.