PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
48.74%
Some net income increase while AEM is negative at -319.22%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
55.61%
Some D&A expansion while AEM is negative at -3.04%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
-167.85%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
50.53%
Less SBC growth vs. AEM's 177.13%, indicating lower equity issuance. David Dodd would confirm the firm still retains key staff.
680.22%
Well above AEM's 69.54% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
109.57%
AR growth while AEM is negative at -122.27%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
-364.99%
Negative yoy inventory while AEM is 78.93%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
-41.31%
Both negative yoy AP, with AEM at -0.00%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
2108.31%
Growth well above AEM's 1760.43%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
-644.39%
Negative yoy while AEM is 2059.95%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
45.21%
Operating cash flow growth similar to AEM's 48.41%. Walter Schloss would see parallel improvements or market conditions in cash generation.
-396.20%
Both yoy lines negative, with AEM at -1.25%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
-152781.91%
Both yoy lines negative, with AEM at -416.28%. Martin Whitman sees an overall caution or integration phase for both companies’ expansions.
12.62%
Some yoy expansion while AEM is negative at -574.28%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
35189753.73%
Proceeds from sales/maturities above 1.5x AEM's 100.00%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is capitalizing on strong valuations or freeing liquidity for expansions.
-165.36%
Both yoy lines negative, with AEM at -27.23%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-379.21%
Both yoy lines negative, with AEM at -12.40%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
15.38%
We repay more while AEM is negative at -731.46%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
2091.46%
We slightly raise equity while AEM is negative at -2.45%. John Neff sees competitor possibly preserving share count or buying back shares.
267.80%
Buyback growth of 267.80% while AEM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.