95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
26.42%
Net income growth 1.25-1.5x AEM's 21.14%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify whether cost discipline or revenue gains drive the outperformance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-45.54%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
54.27%
SBC growth well above AEM's 12.64%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
177.43%
Well above AEM's 332.10% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
93.29%
AR growth of 93.29% while AEM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild difference in credit approach that could matter for cash flow.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both negative yoy AP, with AEM at -171209.81%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
393.87%
Some yoy usage while AEM is negative at -215518.43%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
2.19%
Some yoy increase while AEM is negative at -138.37%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
8.76%
Operating cash flow growth at 50-75% of AEM's 13.44%. Martin Whitman would worry about lagging operational liquidity vs. competitor.
32.51%
Some CapEx rise while AEM is negative at -15.50%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both yoy lines are negative, with AEM at -100.00%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
13.54%
Less 'other investing' outflow yoy vs. AEM's 707.09%. David Dodd would see a stronger short-term cash position unless competitor invests more wisely.
-123.72%
Both yoy lines negative, with AEM at -26.72%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
-1.36%
Both yoy lines negative, with AEM at -1455423.05%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting net new borrowings or weaker paydowns across the niche.
-100.00%
Negative yoy issuance while AEM is 1.45%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.