PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-12.16%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with FNV at -80.38%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
-9.55%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with FNV at -9.18%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
154.30%
Well above FNV's 201.58% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
345.27%
SBC growth while FNV is negative at -3.16%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
-212.21%
Negative yoy working capital usage while FNV is 161.35%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-88.61%
Negative yoy while FNV is 115.63%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-18.85%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with FNV at -12.04%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
76.26%
CapEx growth well above FNV's 98.57%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
100.00%
Acquisition growth of 100.00% while FNV is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
95.25%
We have some outflow growth while FNV is negative at -100.00%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
72.46%
Lower net investing outflow yoy vs. FNV's 163.92%, preserving short-term cash. David Dodd would confirm expansions remain sufficient.
95.15%
Debt repayment growth of 95.15% while FNV is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.