PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
19.33%
Net income growth under 50% of FNV's 254.09%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
13.29%
D&A growth well above FNV's 26.28%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
-342.07%
Negative yoy deferred tax while FNV stands at 35.96%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-35.10%
Negative yoy SBC while FNV is 18.39%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
12.04%
Slight usage while FNV is negative at -122.58%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
100.00%
AR growth of 100.00% while FNV is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild difference in credit approach that could matter for cash flow.
100.00%
Inventory growth of 100.00% while FNV is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate build that must match future sales to avoid risk.
100.00%
AP growth of 100.00% while FNV is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might matter for short-term liquidity if expansions are large.
-100.00%
Negative yoy usage while FNV is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
92.91%
Some yoy increase while FNV is negative at -861.37%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
16.30%
Some CFO growth while FNV is negative at -5.73%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
100.00%
Some CapEx rise while FNV is negative at -1058.63%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1640.44%
Negative yoy purchasing while FNV stands at 53.71%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-5926.89%
We reduce yoy other investing while FNV is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-1645.23%
Both yoy lines negative, with FNV at -62.30%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Buyback growth of 100.00% while FNV is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.