PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
21.19%
Net income growth under 50% of FNV's 56.95%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
25.94%
D&A growth well above FNV's 46.91%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
189.32%
Lower deferred tax growth vs. FNV's 456.68%, implying fewer future tax liabilities. David Dodd would confirm there’s no short-term tax shock instead.
44.54%
SBC growth while FNV is negative at -15.10%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
78.15%
Slight usage while FNV is negative at -199.62%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
19.73%
AR growth of 19.73% while FNV is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild difference in credit approach that could matter for cash flow.
96.72%
Inventory growth of 96.72% while FNV is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate build that must match future sales to avoid risk.
12.50%
AP growth of 12.50% while FNV is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might matter for short-term liquidity if expansions are large.
-169.29%
Negative yoy usage while FNV is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
3888.06%
Well above FNV's 105.96%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
32.30%
Some CFO growth while FNV is negative at -28.15%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
85.96%
CapEx growth well above FNV's 22.99%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both yoy lines are negative, with FNV at -73.47%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
-212.50%
We reduce yoy other investing while FNV is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-165.87%
We reduce yoy invests while FNV stands at 87.04%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.