PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-24.94%
Negative net income growth while FNV stands at 206.95%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
-49.20%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with FNV at -62.63%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
-47.69%
Negative yoy deferred tax while FNV stands at 140.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-48.28%
Negative yoy SBC while FNV is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
-107.18%
Both reduce yoy usage, with FNV at -126.67%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-71.72%
AR is negative yoy while FNV is 234.55%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-101.24%
Negative yoy usage while FNV is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
106.72%
Some yoy increase while FNV is negative at -95.96%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
-34.81%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with FNV at -12.27%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
-124042.39%
Negative yoy CapEx while FNV is 99.22%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
86.39%
Growth well above FNV's 44.12%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
-83779.96%
We reduce yoy invests while FNV stands at 110.26%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
-601.12%
We cut debt repayment yoy while FNV is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.