PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-89.31%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with FNV at -2.80%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
3.58%
Less D&A growth vs. FNV's 10.92%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
127.08%
Some yoy growth while FNV is negative at -175.44%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
-72.04%
Negative yoy SBC while FNV is 7.14%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
266.55%
Well above FNV's 469.05% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
223.37%
AR growth well above FNV's 277.78%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-174.73%
Negative yoy AP while FNV is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
144.39%
Lower 'other working capital' growth vs. FNV's 521.21%. David Dodd would see fewer unexpected short-term demands on cash.
101.73%
Well above FNV's 44.68%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
-19.81%
Negative yoy CFO while FNV is 15.18%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
16.94%
CapEx growth well above FNV's 1.54%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
-377.07%
Negative yoy acquisition while FNV stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
-377.07%
Negative yoy purchasing while FNV stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-79.34%
We reduce yoy sales while FNV is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
108.52%
Growth of 108.52% while FNV is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a moderate difference requiring justification by ROI in these smaller invests.
-21.74%
We reduce yoy invests while FNV stands at 1.54%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
64.56%
Debt repayment growth of 64.56% while FNV is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.