PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-79.93%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with FNV at -160.08%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
4.87%
Less D&A growth vs. FNV's 107.88%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
2028.04%
Well above FNV's 158.14% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
468.64%
SBC growth while FNV is negative at -26.67%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
264.57%
Slight usage while FNV is negative at -171.61%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
-119.34%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with FNV at -1025.00%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
AP growth of 100.00% while FNV is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might matter for short-term liquidity if expansions are large.
1196.43%
Some yoy usage while FNV is negative at -73.38%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
-185.37%
Negative yoy while FNV is 76.92%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
0.04%
Some CFO growth while FNV is negative at -23.71%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
99.89%
Some CapEx rise while FNV is negative at -220.13%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
100.00%
Acquisition growth of 100.00% while FNV is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
100.00%
Purchases growth of 100.00% while FNV is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
-100.00%
We reduce yoy sales while FNV is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
-348.28%
We reduce yoy other investing while FNV is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
99.78%
We have mild expansions while FNV is negative at -219.13%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
-316.07%
We cut debt repayment yoy while FNV is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.