95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
2.54%
Net income growth 1.25-1.5x FNV's 2.22%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify whether cost discipline or revenue gains drive the outperformance.
0.18%
Less D&A growth vs. FNV's 19.07%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
-76.49%
Negative yoy deferred tax while FNV stands at 717.39%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-649.14%
Negative yoy SBC while FNV is 14.29%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
-295.69%
Both reduce yoy usage, with FNV at -115.67%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-3131.59%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with FNV at -48.93%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
147.24%
AP growth of 147.24% while FNV is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might matter for short-term liquidity if expansions are large.
-1616.70%
Both reduce yoy usage, with FNV at -242.70%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
-919.60%
Negative yoy while FNV is 54.76%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-6.78%
Negative yoy CFO while FNV is 9.32%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
58.29%
Some CapEx rise while FNV is negative at -185.20%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-214.58%
Negative yoy purchasing while FNV stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-101.56%
Both yoy lines are negative, with FNV at -95.90%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
-188.06%
Both yoy lines negative, with FNV at -95.90%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-56.08%
Both yoy lines negative, with FNV at -204.43%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
99.91%
Debt repayment growth of 99.91% while FNV is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
-86.06%
Negative yoy issuance while FNV is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.