95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-46.04%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with FNV at -17.61%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
-3.38%
Negative yoy D&A while FNV is 1863.16%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-2.19%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
79.42%
SBC growth while FNV is negative at -54.29%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
-482.86%
Both reduce yoy usage, with FNV at -141.60%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-1119.88%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with FNV at -161.21%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
117.96%
Inventory growth of 117.96% while FNV is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate build that must match future sales to avoid risk.
-231.38%
Negative yoy AP while FNV is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
14.21%
Lower 'other working capital' growth vs. FNV's 268.02%. David Dodd would see fewer unexpected short-term demands on cash.
100.39%
Some yoy increase while FNV is negative at -24800.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
7.81%
Some CFO growth while FNV is negative at -17.35%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
84.87%
CapEx growth well above FNV's 83.85%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-393066.90%
Negative yoy purchasing while FNV stands at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-100.00%
We reduce yoy sales while FNV is 20737.66%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
181.48%
Growth well above FNV's 108.72%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
76.94%
Investing outflow well above FNV's 95.60%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
-1.52%
We cut debt repayment yoy while FNV is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
164.26%
Lower share issuance yoy vs. FNV's 2457.61%, implying less dilution. David Dodd would confirm the firm still has enough capital for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.