PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-5.33%
Negative net income growth while FNV stands at 7.97%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
14.34%
Some D&A expansion while FNV is negative at -6.70%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
-70.04%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
-268.04%
Both cut yoy SBC, with FNV at -12.50%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
146.27%
Slight usage while FNV is negative at -20.20%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
186.50%
AR growth well above FNV's 54.89%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
-274.44%
Negative yoy inventory while FNV is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
5.27%
AP growth of 5.27% while FNV is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might matter for short-term liquidity if expansions are large.
-33.05%
Both reduce yoy usage, with FNV at -160.55%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
-55.38%
Negative yoy while FNV is 81.78%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-1.99%
Negative yoy CFO while FNV is 11.58%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
66.20%
Some CapEx rise while FNV is negative at -232.26%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
86.92%
Purchases growth of 86.92% while FNV is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-75.00%
Both yoy lines negative, with FNV at -413.33%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
72.51%
We have mild expansions while FNV is negative at -825.00%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
-1.00%
We cut debt repayment yoy while FNV is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
-69.57%
Negative yoy issuance while FNV is 5.75%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.