PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-15.44%
Negative net income growth while FNV stands at 5.03%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
-4.62%
Negative yoy D&A while FNV is 12150.00%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-203.03%
Negative yoy deferred tax while FNV stands at 68.89%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
9953.49%
SBC growth well above FNV's 125.00%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
14.17%
Less working capital growth vs. FNV's 427.08%, indicating potentially more efficient day-to-day cash usage. David Dodd would confirm no negative impact on revenue.
-1.54%
AR is negative yoy while FNV is 342.79%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
388.85%
Inventory growth of 388.85% while FNV is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate build that must match future sales to avoid risk.
-14.78%
Negative yoy AP while FNV is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
-37.48%
Negative yoy usage while FNV is 249.10%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
57.18%
Some yoy increase while FNV is negative at -90.84%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
11.35%
Operating cash flow growth at 50-75% of FNV's 20.23%. Martin Whitman would worry about lagging operational liquidity vs. competitor.
283.86%
Some CapEx rise while FNV is negative at -3932.26%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
79.73%
Less growth in investment purchases vs. FNV's 196.04%, preserving near-term liquidity. David Dodd would confirm no strategic investment opportunities are lost.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-99.14%
We reduce yoy other investing while FNV is 71.04%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
284.00%
We have mild expansions while FNV is negative at -217.80%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
1.99%
Debt repayment growth of 1.99% while FNV is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
4483.93%
Lower share issuance yoy vs. FNV's 9842.99%, implying less dilution. David Dodd would confirm the firm still has enough capital for expansions.
-4483.93%
We cut yoy buybacks while FNV is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.