95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-32.95%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with FNV at -5.15%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
-15.21%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with FNV at -17.00%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
46.81%
Some yoy growth while FNV is negative at -46.71%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
-12.71%
Both cut yoy SBC, with FNV at -58.33%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
-138.38%
Both reduce yoy usage, with FNV at -192.36%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-57.16%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with FNV at -220.94%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
-60.23%
Negative yoy inventory while FNV is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
-369.57%
Negative yoy AP while FNV is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
-116.73%
Both reduce yoy usage, with FNV at -32.90%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
92.37%
Some yoy increase while FNV is negative at -144.52%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
-21.46%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with FNV at -24.88%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
-136.94%
Negative yoy CapEx while FNV is 12.32%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
100.00%
Less M&A spending yoy vs. FNV's 1279.41%, reducing near-term risk. David Dodd would confirm the firm is not missing out on a strategic deal that competitor might exploit.
-3857.59%
Both yoy lines negative, with FNV at -509.39%. Martin Whitman would suspect an environment with fewer attractive securities or a strategic pivot to internal growth.
-100.00%
We reduce yoy sales while FNV is 102207.78%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
-5988.89%
We reduce yoy other investing while FNV is 1079.32%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-146.85%
Both yoy lines negative, with FNV at -4.48%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
-2.54%
We cut debt repayment yoy while FNV is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
233.43%
We slightly raise equity while FNV is negative at -71.44%. John Neff sees competitor possibly preserving share count or buying back shares.
100.00%
Buyback growth of 100.00% while FNV is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.