PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
26.98%
Net income growth above 1.5x FNV's 17.89%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
6.16%
Less D&A growth vs. FNV's 20.81%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
193.24%
Some yoy growth while FNV is negative at -13.58%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
-39.38%
Negative yoy SBC while FNV is 13.33%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
181.32%
Well above FNV's 145.52% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
151.10%
AR growth well above FNV's 147.09%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
-70.23%
Negative yoy inventory while FNV is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
113.08%
AP growth of 113.08% while FNV is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might matter for short-term liquidity if expansions are large.
-1069.64%
Both reduce yoy usage, with FNV at -161.32%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
111.57%
Some yoy increase while FNV is negative at -313.60%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
49.79%
Operating cash flow growth above 1.5x FNV's 24.83%. David Dodd would confirm superior cost control or stronger revenue-to-cash conversion.
-174.62%
Both yoy lines negative, with FNV at -47.81%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
99.62%
Less growth in investment purchases vs. FNV's 201.56%, preserving near-term liquidity. David Dodd would confirm no strategic investment opportunities are lost.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-128.11%
Both yoy lines negative, with FNV at -1692.75%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-3.55%
Both yoy lines negative, with FNV at -56.53%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
12.38%
Debt repayment growth of 12.38% while FNV is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
-88.06%
Negative yoy issuance while FNV is 43.68%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.